Hi
Dirk van der Ven
An interesting read, thanks for sharing! Most inventions are the result of someone trying to solve a problem, so it makes sense to me that the first large scale agriculture would be a response to an increased demand for food.
I think the historical stuff is quite clear. However, when you make the link between the past and the present, it feels like an afterthought. I understand the connection you are trying to make, but I don't think you've explained it clearly enough. Also, most of this text is about the history. Then when you get to the present (the most important bit?), it becomes vague and lacking in detail. I would tend to trim down the history a bit and beef up the present.
Maybe also get rid of the phrase, "From the previous paragraph we can conclude". Instead, focus on making those conclusions more immediately obvious to the reader from what you have written.
I also noticed some small grammar mistakes, so it needs a proof read.
I hope the comments help